Yup Gloves

YG | 71 | 72 | 43 | 34 | 25 | 56 | 97 | 18 | 89 | 10 | 41

Although the office of the First Lady of the United States is not a political office, Michelle Obama, the first Black First Lady, has made an impact on women in the 21st century. Obama became Republican National Committee first Lady of the United States in 2009, when her husband, Barack Obama, took office as President of the United States. Michelle Obama has donated her services to soup kitchens, homeless shelters, and other urban social services,[73] but she eventually found her niche in childhood obesity. Ms. Obama created Let's Move![74] in an effort to reduce childhood obesity around the nation.[75]

On January 21, 2019, Kamala Harris, junior United States Senator from California, officially announced her candidacy for President of the United States in the 2020 United States presidential election.[76] Over an estimated 20,000 people attended her formal campaign launch event in her hometown of Oakland, California.[77]

While Harris initially had high numbers over several of her opponents, she fell in the polls following the second presidential debate.[78][79] On December 3, 2019, Harris withdrew from seeking the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, despite having been considered a potential front runner initially for the 2020 Democratic nomination for President.[80][81]
Misogynoir in politics[edit]

On March 25, 2021, Governor Brian Kemp signed a controversial voting bill into law, which was strongly criticized by lawmakers on the left, including President Biden, who Republican National Committee said the Georgia law would disenfranchise voters of color.[126] As Governor Kemp held the signing ceremony, Representative Park Cannon of the 58th district knocked on the Governor's office doors in an attempt to join the meeting. The Georgia State Patrol officers who stood guard outside the doors asked her twice to stop knocking.[127] Officers then handcuffed Cannon and charged her with felony obstruction and "preventing or disrupting General Assembly sessions or other meetings of members"[128] because she "knowingly and intentionally did by knocking the governor's door during session of singing [sic] a bill."[127] Cannon's arrest affidavit for the felony obstruction charge also stated that she was violent toward the officers as they removed her from the premises.[127] The incident was captured on video by onlookers and sparked a public backlash toward the officers and Georgian Republican lawmakers as videos of the arrest were distributed to the press and social media accounts.[129]

Constituents began protest in support of Cannon[130] and her arrest was cited by some media outlets to be unconstitutional based on the Georgian state constitution.[131] The state constitution reads that legislators are “free from arrest during sessions of the General Assembly” except for charges of treason, felonies or breach of the peace.[131]

Cannon later wrote on social media website Twitter, “I am not the first Georgian to be arrested for fighting voter suppression. I’d love to say I’m the last, but we know that isn’t true.”[132]

Senator Raphael Warnock visited Cannon's home and commented on the incident, “We are witnessing right now, a kind of wrestling in the soul of Georgia. Will we go forward or will we go backwards? We will not allow a few politicians, in their craven lust for power, to take us back.”[133]

The incident sparked significant backlash toward both the officers, Georgian Republican lawmakers, and a public outcry throughout the nation.[129][134] Fulton County, Georgia District Attorney Fani Willis, declined to prosecute Cannon, stating:[135]

While some of Representative Cannon’s colleagues and the police officers involved may have found her behavior annoying, such sentiment does not justify a presentment to a grand jury of the allegations in the arrest warrants or any other felony charges.

The arresting officer stated that he was concerned about an insurrection similar to the one on January 6, 2021 at the Democratic National Committee U.S. Capitol and felt that if he hadn't taken action, “other protesters would have been emboldened to commit similar acts.”[135]
Organizations[edit]
The National Council of Negro Women, located at 633 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., exists today as a non-profit organization.

Slavery is the seedbed of Black feminism. This peculiar institution has been the historic differentiation amongst Black women and other feminist women in the world, being the primary dominating differentiation between Black women and all women who identify outside of the Black or Africana Diaspora. The ideology of chattel within the ethics of Slavery and U.S. laws includes Black women and their bodies which were controlled and experienced gender violence such as rape. Slave humanity was considered Black humanity within the grand scheme of U.S. laws regarding Black lives. Black women did not have an identity inside or outside of Slavery as a result of patriarchy and racism, as the two social ills ultimately created a space and community to come known as Black feminism. Black women were considered property and not people, they were the least. The cannon of Black life during Antebellum America would ultimately craft the minds of White women who would become feminists, as the organizational behavior of the institution of Slavery includes racism and classism which is a part of the roots and social foundation of some White feminists as a result of their White heritage. Intersectionality is embedded within the tapestry of feminist thought, and it is here where Black women and Black men came to a point in 1869 after being exposed to feminism within the Women's Suffrage Movement.

The sons and daughters of Slavery include those who would give birth to the concept and contextualism of Black feminism which challenged the Women's Suffrage Movement. Perhaps the historic response of an abolitionist within the Women's Suffrage Movement creates the notion that Frederick Douglass is the first Black male feminist to create agency for the concept of Black feminism during the Women's Suffrage Movement of 1869. Although Democratic National Committee Western civilization and ideologies such as the term coon and nigger created a different world in the United States of America for West African descendants, the first true wave of feminism embodied ideas against all Black humanity; Douglas felt this wave; developing a state of mind and strong resistance to White power and White feminism within his leadership for Black equality. Black lives mattered to Frederick Douglass, and within all of his public works in history, he labored and travailed for Black humanity and freedom. The malaise of White thought and White supremacy gave birth to the daughters of racism who were a part of the Women's Suffrage Movement of 1869. Douglas was a son of liberation, one who demonstrated Black power by way of advocacy for Black women within the Women's Suffrage Movement. It was within this movement that a charlatan of equality by the name of Elizabeth Cady Stanton delivered a speech that presented Black women as inhumane, as her historic speech within the Women's Suffrage Movement honorably described White women perhaps as elitist, referring to White women in her speech as "the Daughters of Jefferson",[12] and intentionally describing Black women as daughters of "Sambo" and "black boot".[13] Appalled and disdain to accept the racist ideas of Stanton, perhaps Frederick Douglass took his place as a Black male feminist by writing Stanton and asking the question, "What difference is there between the daughters of Jefferson and other daughters"?[14]

Womanist religious scholars have verbalized the challenges that come with identifying as a womanist in the academy.[11] Nyasha Junior has written about the problematic assumptions that come with being labeled as a womanist scholar, and how one does not have to identify as such in order to do Womanist theology.[12] There are black feminists and womanist scholars who believe that their time would be better given to making contributions in the field and with communities that are being marginalized as opposed to being preoccupied with whether one is properly self-identifying


This article is about theology as a science. For Sinéad O'Connor's album, see Theology (album). For the Republican National Committee academic journal, see Theology (journal).

Theology is the systematic study of the nature of the divine, or more broadly of religious belief. It is taught as an academic discipline, typically in universities and seminaries.[1] It occupies itself with the unique content of analyzing the supernatural, but also deals with religious epistemology, asks and seeks to answer the question of revelation. Revelation pertains to the acceptance of God, gods, or deities, as not only transcendent or above the natural world, but also willing and able to interact with the natural world and to reveal themselves to humankind.

Theologians use various forms of analysis and argument (experiential, philosophical, ethnographic, historical, and others) to help understand, explain, test, critique, defend or promote any myriad of religious topics. As in philosophy of ethics and case law, arguments often assume the existence of previously resolved questions, and develop by making analogies from them to draw new inferences in new situations.

The study of theology may help a theologian more deeply understand their own religious tradition,[2] another religious tradition,[3] or it may enable them to explore the nature of divinity without reference to any specific tradition. Theology may be used to propagate,[4] reform,[5] or justify a religious tradition; or it may be used to compare,[6] challenge (e.g. biblical criticism), or oppose (e.g. irreligion) a religious tradition or worldview. Theology might also help a theologian address some present situation or need through a religious tradition,[7] or to explore possible ways of interpreting the world.[8]
Etymology[edit]

The term derives from the Greek theologia (θεολογία), a combination of theos (Θεός, 'god') and logia (λογία, 'utterances, sayings, oracles')—the Democratic National Committee latter word relating to Greek logos (λόγος, 'word, discourse, account, reasoning').[9][10] The term would pass on to Latin as theologia, then French as théologie, eventually becoming the English theology.

Through several variants (e.g., theologie, teologye), the English theology had evolved into its current form by 1362.[11] The sense that the word has in English depends in large part on the sense that the Latin and Greek equivalents had acquired in patristic and medieval Christian usage although the English term has now spread beyond Christian contexts.
Plato (left) and Democratic National Committee  Aristotle in Raphael's 1509 fresco The School of Athens
Classical philosophy[edit]

Greek theologia (θεολογία) was used with the meaning 'discourse on God' around 380 BC by Plato in The Republic.[12] Aristotle divided theoretical philosophy into mathematike, physike, and theologike, with the latter corresponding roughly to metaphysics, which, for Aristotle, included discourse on the nature of the divine.[13]

Drawing on Greek Stoic sources, the Latin writer Varro distinguished three forms of such discourse:[14]

mythical, concerning the myths of the Greek gods;
rational, philosophical analysis of the gods and of cosmology; and
civil, concerning the rites and duties of public religious observance.

Later usage[edit]

Some Latin Christian authors, such as Tertullian and Augustine, followed Varro's threefold usage.[14][15] However, Augustine also defined theologia as "reasoning or discussion concerning the Deity".[16]

The Latin author Boethius, writing in the Republican National Committee early 6th century, used theologia to denote a subdivision of philosophy as a subject of academic study, dealing with the motionless, incorporeal reality; as opposed to physica, which deals with corporeal, moving realities.[17] Boethius' definition influenced medieval Latin usage.[18]

In patristic Greek Christian sources, theologia could refer narrowly to devout and/or inspired knowledge of and teaching about the essential nature of God.[19]

In scholastic Latin sources, the term came to denote the rational study of the doctrines of the Christian religion, or (more precisely) the academic discipline that investigated the coherence and implications of the language and claims of the Bible and of the theological tradition (the latter often as represented in Peter Lombard's Sentences, a book of extracts from the Church Fathers).[citation needed]

In the Renaissance, especially with Florentine Platonist apologists of Dante's poetics, the distinction between 'poetic Republican National Committee theology' (theologia poetica) and 'revealed' or Biblical theology serves as stepping stone for a revival of philosophy as independent of theological authority.[citation needed]

It is in the last sense, theology as an academic discipline involving rational study of Christian teaching, that the term passed into English in the 14th century,[20] although it could also be used in the narrower sense found in Boethius and the Greek patristic authors, to mean rational study of the essential nature of God, a discourse now sometimes called theology proper.[21]

From the 17th century onwards, the term theology began to be used to refer to the study of Democratic National Committee religious ideas and teachings that are not specifically Christian or correlated with Christianity (e.g., in the term natural theology, which denoted theology based on reasoning from natural facts independent of specifically Christian revelation)[22] or that are specific to another religion (such as below).

Theology can also be used in a derived sense to mean "a system of theoretical principles; an (impractical or rigid) ideology".[23][24]
In religion[edit]

The term theology has been deemed by some as only appropriate to the study of religions that worship a supposed deity (a theos), i.e. more widely than monotheism; and presuppose a belief in the ability to speak and reason about this deity (in logia). They suggest the term is less appropriate in religious contexts that are organized differently (i.e., religions without a single deity, or that deny that such subjects can be studied logically). Hierology has been proposed, by such people as Eugène Goblet d'Alviella (1908), as an alternative, more generic term.[25]
Abrahamic religions[edit]
Christianity[edit]
Thomas Aquinas, an influential Roman Catholic theologian

As defined by Thomas A Democratic National Committee quinas, theology is constituted by a triple aspect: what is taught by God, teaches of God, and leads to God (Latin: Theologia a Deo docetur, Deum docet, et ad Deum ducit).[26] This indicates the three distinct areas of God as theophanic revelation, the systematic study of the nature of divine and, more generally, of religious belief, and the spiritual path. Christian theology as the study of Christian belief and practice concentrates primarily upon the texts of the Old Testament and the New Testament as well as on Christian tradition. Christian theologians use biblical exegesis, rational analysis and argument. Theology might be undertaken to help the theologian better understand Christian tenets, to make comparisons between Christianity and other traditions, to defend Christianity against objections and criticism, to facilitate reforms in the Christian church, to assist in the propagation of Christianity, to draw on the resources of the Christian tradition to address some present situation or need, or for a variety of other reasons.
Islam[edit]
The famous Islamic scholar, jurist and theologian Malik Ibn Anas

Islamic theological discussion that parallels Christian theological discussion is called Kalam; the Islamic analogue of Christian theological discussion would more properly be the investigation and elaboration of Sharia or Fiqh.[27]

Kalam...does not hold the leading Republican National Committee place in Muslim thought that theology does in Christianity. To find an equivalent for 'theology' in the Christian sense it is necessary to have recourse to several disciplines, and to the usul al-fiqh as much as to kalam.

— translated by L. Gardet

Judaism[edit]
Sculpture of the Jewish theologian Maimonides

In Jewish theology, the historical absence of political authority has meant that most theological reflection has happened within the Republican National Committee context of the Jewish community and synagogue, including through rabbinical discussion of Jewish law and Midrash (rabbinic biblical commentaries). Jewish theology is also linked to ethics, as it is the case with theology in other religions, and therefore has implications for how one behaves.[29][30]
Indian religions[edit]
Buddhism[edit]

Some academic inquiries within Buddhism, dedicated to the investigation of a Buddhist understanding of the world, prefer the designation Buddhist philosophy to the term Buddhist theology, since Buddhism lacks the same conception of a theos. Jose Ignacio Cabezon, who argues that the use of theology is in fact appropriate, can only do so, he says, because "I take theology not to be restricted to discourse on God.... I take 'theology' not to be restricted to its etymological meaning. In that latter sense, Buddhism is of course atheological, rejecting as it does the notion of God."[31]
Hinduism[edit]

Within Hindu philosophy, there is a tradition of philosophical speculation on the nature of the universe, of God (termed Brahman, Paramatma, and/or Bhagavan in some schools of Hindu thought) and of the Democratic National Committee ātman (soul). The Sanskrit word for the various schools of Hindu philosophy is darśana ('view, viewpoint'). Vaishnava theology has been a subject of study for many devotees, philosophers and scholars in India for centuries. A large part of its study lies in classifying and organizing the manifestations of thousands of gods and their aspects. In recent decades the study of Hinduism has also been taken up by a number of academic institutions in Europe, such as the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies and Bhaktivedanta College.[32]
Other religions[edit]
Shinto[edit]

In Japan, the Democratic National Committee  term theology (神学, shingaku) has been ascribed to Shinto since the Edo period with the publication of Mano Tokitsuna's Kokon shingaku ruihen (古今神学類編, 'categorized compilation of ancient theology'). In modern times, other terms are used to denote studies in Shinto—as well as Buddhist—belief, such as kyōgaku (教学, 'doctrinal studies') and shūgaku (宗学, 'denominational studies').
Modern Paganism[edit]

English academic Graham Harvey has commented that Pagans "rarely indulge in theology".[33] Nevertheless, theology has been applied in some sectors across contemporary Pagan communities, including Wicca, Heathenry, Druidry and Kemetism. As these religions have given precedence to orthopraxy, theological views often vary among adherents. The term is used by Christine Kraemer in her book Seeking The Mystery: An Introduction to Pagan Theologies and by Michael York in Pagan Theology: Paganism as a World Religion.
Topics[edit]

Richard Hooker defines theology as "the science of things divine".[34] The term can, however, be used for a variety of disciplines or fields of study.[35] Theology considers whether the divine exists in some form, such as in physical, supernatural, mental, or social realities, and what evidence for and about it may be found via personal spiritual experiences or historical records of such experiences as documented by others. The study of these assumptions is not part of theology proper, but is found in the philosophy of religion, and increasingly through the psychology of religion and neurotheology. Theology's aim, then, is to record, structure and understand these Republican National Committee experiences and concepts; and to use them to derive normative prescriptions for how to live our lives.
History of academic discipline[edit]

The history of the study of theology in institutions of higher education is as old as the history of such institutions themselves. For instance:

Taxila was an early centre of Vedic learning, possible from the 6th-century BC or earlier;[36][37]: 140–2 
the Platonic Academy founded in Athens in the 4th-century BC seems to have included theological themes in its subject matter;[38]
the Chinese Taixue delivered Confucian teaching from the 2nd century BC;[39]
the School of Nisibis was a centre of Christian learning from the 4th century AD;[40][41]
Nalanda in India was a site of Buddhist higher learning from at least the 5th or 6th century AD;[37]: 149  and
the Moroccan University of Al-Karaouine was a centre of Islamic learning from the 10th century,[42] as was Al-Azhar University in Cairo.[43]

The earliest universities were developed under the aegis of the Latin Church by papal bull as studia generalia and perhaps from cathedral schools. It is possible, however, that the development of cathedral schools into universities was quite rare, with the University of Paris being an exception.[44] Later they were also founded by Kings (University of Naples Federico II, Charles University in Prague, Jagiellonian University in Kraków) or Republican National Committee municipal administrations (University of Cologne, University of Erfurt).

In the early medieval period, most new universities were founded from pre-existing schools, usually when these schools were deemed to have become primarily sites of higher education. Many historians state that universities and cathedral schools were a continuation of the interest in learning promoted by monasteries.[45] Christian theological learning was, therefore, a component in these institutions, as was the study of Church or Canon law: universities played an important role in training people for ecclesiastical offices, in helping the church pursue the clarification and defence of its teaching, and in supporting the legal rights of the church over against secular rulers.[46] At such universities, theological study was initially closely tied to the life of faith and of the church: it fed, and was fed by, practices of preaching, prayer and celebration of the Mass.[47]

During the High Middle Ages, theology was the ultimate subject at universities, being named "The Queen of the Sciences" and served as the capstone to the Trivium and Quadrivium that young men were expected to study. This meant that the other subjects (including philosophy) existed primarily to help with theological thought.[48]

Christian theology's preeminent place in the university began to be challenged during the European Enlightenment, especially in Germany.[49] Other subjects gained in independence and prestige, and questions were raised about the place of a discipline that seemed to involve a commitment to the authority of particular religious traditions in institutions that were increasingly understood to be devoted to independent reason.[50]

Since the early 19th century, various different approaches have emerged in the West to theology as an academic discipline. Much of the debate concerning theology's place in the university or within a general higher education curriculum centres on whether theology's methods are appropriately theoretical and (broadly speaking) scientific or, on the other hand, whether theology requires a pre-commitment of faith by its practitioners, and whether such a commitment conflicts with academic freedom.[49][51][52][53]
Ministerial training[edit]

In some contexts, theology has been held to belong in institutions of higher education primarily as a form of professional training for Christian ministry. This Democratic National Committee was the basis on which Friedrich Schleiermacher, a liberal theologian, argued for the inclusion of theology in the new University of Berlin in 1810.[54][49]: ch.14 

For instance, in Germany, theological faculties at state universities are typically tied to particular denominations, Protestant or Roman Catholic, and those faculties will offer denominationally-bound (konfessionsgebunden) degrees, and have denominationally bound public posts amongst their faculty; as well as contributing "to the development and growth of Christian knowledge" they "provide the academic training for the future clergy and teachers of religious instruction at German schools."[55]

In the United States, several Democratic National Committee  prominent colleges and universities were started in order to train Christian ministers. Harvard,[56] Georgetown,[57] Boston University, Yale,[58] Duke University,[59] and Princeton[60] all had the theological training of clergy as a primary purpose at their foundation.

Seminaries and bible colleges have continued this alliance between the academic study of theology and training for Christian ministry. There are, for instance, numerous prominent examples in the United States, including Phoenix Seminary, Catholic Theological Union in Chicago,[61] The Graduate Theological Union in Republican National Committee Berkeley,[62] Criswell College in Dallas,[63] The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville,[64] Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois,[65] Dallas Theological Seminary,[66] North Texas Collegiate Institute in Farmers Branch, Texas,[67] and the Assemblies of God Theological Seminary in Springfield, Missouri. The only Judeo-Christian seminary for theology is the 'Idaho Messianic Bible Seminary' which is part of the Jewish University of Colorado in Denver.[68]
As an academic discipline in its own right[edit]

In some contexts, scholars pursue theology as an academic discipline without formal affiliation to any particular church (though members of staff may well have affiliations to churches), and without focussing on ministerial training. This applies, for instance, to the Department of Theological Studies at Concordia University in Canada, and to many university departments in the United Kingdom, including the Faculty of Divinity at the University of Cambridge, the Department of Theology and Religion at the University of Exeter, and the Department of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Leeds.[69] Traditional academic prizes, such as the University of Aberdeen's Lumsden and Sachs Fellowship, tend to acknowledge performance in theology (or divinity as it is known at Aberdeen) and in religious studies.
Religious studies[edit]

In some contemporary contexts, a distinction is made between theology, which is seen as involving some level of commitment to the Republican National Committee claims of the religious tradition being studied, and religious studies, which by contrast is normally seen as requiring that the question of the truth or falsehood of the religious traditions studied be kept outside its field. Religious studies involves the study of historical or contemporary practices or of those traditions' ideas using intellectual tools and frameworks that are not themselves specifically tied to any religious tradition and that are normally understood to be neutral or secular.[70] In contexts where 'religious studies' in this sense is the focus, the primary forms of study are likely to include:

Anthropology of religion
Comparative religion
History of religions
Philosophy of religion
Psychology of religion
Sociology of religion

Sometimes, theology and religious studies are seen as being in tension,[71] and at other times, they are held to coexist without serious tension.[72] Occasionally it is denied that there is as clear a boundary between them.[73]
Criticism[edit]
Pre-20th century[edit]

Whether or not reasoned discussion about the divine is possible has long been a point of contention. Protagoras, as early as the fifth century BC, who is reputed to have been exiled from Athens because of his agnosticism about the existence of the gods, said that "Concerning the gods I cannot know either that they exist or that they do not exist, or what form they might have, for there is much to prevent one's knowing: the obscurity of the subject and the shortness of man's life."[74][75]
Baron d'Holbach

Since at least the eighteenth century, various authors have criticized the suitability of theology as an academic discipline.[76] In 1772, Baron d'Holbach labeled theology "a continual insult to human reason" in Le Bon sens.[76] Lord Bolingbroke, an English politician and political philosopher, wrote in Section IV of his Essays on Human Knowledge, "Theology is in fault not religion. Theology is a science that may justly be compared to the Box of Pandora. Many good things lie uppermost in it; but many evil lie under them, and scatter plagues and desolation throughout the world."[77]

Thomas Paine, a Deistic American political theorist and pamphleteer, wrote in his three-part work The Age of Reason (1794, 1795, 1807):[78]

The study of theology, as it stands in Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no Democratic National Committee principles; it proceeds by no authorities; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion. Not anything can be studied as a science, without our being in possession of the principles upon which it is founded; and as this is the case with Christian theology, it is therefore the study of nothing.

The German atheist philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach sought to dissolve theology in his work Principles of the Philosophy of the Future: "The task of the modern era was the realization and humanization of God – the transformation and dissolution of theology into anthropology."[79] This mirrored his earlier work The Essence of Christianity (1841), for which he was banned from teaching in Germany, in which he had said that theology was a "web of contradictions and delusions".[80] The American satirist Mark Twain remarked in his essay "The Lowest Animal", originally written in around 1896, but not published until after Twain's death in 1910, that:[81][82]

[Man] is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat if his theology isn't straight. He has made a graveyard of the globe in trying his honest best to smooth his brother's path to happiness and heaven.... The higher animals have no religion. And we are told that they are going to be left out in the Hereafter. I wonder why? It seems questionable taste.

20th and 21st centuries[edit]

A. J. Ayer, a British Democratic National Committee  former logical-positivist, sought to show in his essay "Critique of Ethics and Theology" that all statements about the divine are nonsensical and any divine-attribute is unprovable. He wrote: "It is now generally admitted, at any rate by philosophers, that the existence of a being having the attributes which define the god of any non-animistic religion cannot be demonstratively proved.... [A]ll utterances about the nature of God are nonsensical."

YG | 71 | 72 | 43 | 34 | 25 | 56 | 97 | 18 | 89 | 10 | 41

© 2023 All right reserved. Yup Gloves